Tuesday 28 February 2012

Разработка процедуры отображения укладки генерального груза в трюмах судна

Приведено описание процедуры, позволяющей формировать трехмерное изображение укладки груза в трюмах судна.

Моя статья в сборнике "Судовождение" №20, 2011.




Friday 17 February 2012

Ingress volumes - how much water flows into a damaged compartment

SOLAS CH II-1 Regulation 19 requires that each ship to be provided with the damage control information. Very often it is a thin file with the general arrangement plan showing boundaries of the watertight compartments with the openings and their means of closure, position of controls thereof, arrangements for the correction of any list due to flooding; watertight doors arrangement, general and specific precautions considered by the Administration to be vital to the survival of the ship, passengers and crew (i.e., closures, security of cargo, sounding of alarms, etc.).

Frankly speaking, on some ships I found it of just an illustrative use.

The same regulation says:
In case of ships to which damage stability requirements of part B-l apply, damage stability information shall provide the master with a simple and easily understandable way of assessing the ship's survivability in all damage cases involving a compartment or group of compartments. 

"simple and easily understandable way" - unfortunately I have never seen such even on the big brand-new ships.

What about taking decisions? when there is no time? Best of all when you have the knowledge a priori. For instance, when you have the idea of how much time is left to flood the compartment. In order to know that, we need to know how much water floods in.

Source: National Geographic

Ok, imagine the situation: Ship is flooding and you,  calculator in your hand, are look through your books searching for a formulae.
Or otherwise: You have a breach of 2m2 below the waterline and still hope to pump it out with the bilge pump.

In such cases having an evaluation before any similar emergency breaks out is much better.

The table below shows the estimated volumes of water ingress (m3/h) into a damaged compartment.

WATER HEAD (metres below WL), m
AREA OF THE BREACH, m2
SMALL
AVERAGE
LARGE
0,01
0,05
0,10
0,15
0,20
0,50
0,75
1,00
1,50
2,00
1      
104
518
1037
1555
2074
5180
7780
10370
15550
20740
2      
147
726
1470
2200
2940
7260
11000
14700
22000
29400
3      
180
898
1795
2695
3590
8980
13550
17950
26950
35900
4      
208
1037
2075
3110
4150
10370
16550
20750
31100
41500
5      
232
1160
2325
4650
5260
11600
17400
23250
34850
46500
6      
254
1265
2540
3820
5080
12650
19100
25400
38400
50800
7      
275
1370
2750
4130
5500
13700
20650
27500
41300
55000
8      
294
1460
2940
4410
5870
14600
22000
29400
44100
58700
9      
311
1555
3110
4670
6220
15550
23350
31100
46700
6220
10          
318
1590
3180
4770
6360
15900
23850
31800
47700
63600

To estimate the time left to flood the compartment, divide the volume of the compartment by the figure taken from the table, then multiple it by the permeability factor (roughly 0.85 for E/R and 0.90 for cargo spaces).


A.O. Chepok
Creative Commons License
This text is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

Tuesday 14 February 2012

Container service KPI's - Reliability

One of the most important KPI's in a container service is reliability, i.e. probability of the event that delivery is done on time. The recent correction of the 2-year long slump in the reliability could be correlated with the flatting of the tariff rate (figure below).
Source: http://www.ifw-net.com/
The factor to effect is the severe competition which drives the container lines to match their clients' need for the parcel supply reliability. As per Drewry's, the reliability champions among container carriers - Hanjin and Maersk, have achieved unprecedented 90%+ benchmark in the reliability of their services against the industry average level of 69%. This blog's post on Maersk Daily may give an idea of the scale of the efforts and investment required to accomplish the feat.

There are some insights and more info on the topic at the IFW news.

A.O. Chepok
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Wednesday 1 February 2012

Nichioh Maru: LED, Solar panels and low friction hull. The list is not full

I am proud to present a pure car carrier (PCC) that made the news - m/v Nichioh Maru. Built by Shin Kurushima Dockyard for Nissan she began her maiden voyage on January 27, 2012. This car carrier of 1380 CEU was designed for domestic feeder service between Kanto, Kinki and Kyushu. Owned and operated by Nissan, this ship is the other greener ship following m/v City of St. Petersburg that pursues the Company's zero-emission headway.





One who likes less official visits is recommended reading Bertel Schmitt's report. There are many photos and vivid comments.

I must admit, that besides the advanced engine, LED, solars and super smooth coating Nichioh Maru for me is just the same Japanese style PCC. All in the best simplistic traditions, same cargo decks, same bridge, same accommodations.

See Nichioh Maru's live track at aprs.fi

Blog's Most Popular Posts last week