Friday 16 November 2007
Monday 16 April 2007
How Do Words Matter or Be Your Own Advocate
In this article I want to give an example of two different statements of facts, of language, of intentions, and of purpose. While the first was compiled by an attending NYK Portcaptain, the second one was put by the ship for the same event and then accepted by the Portcaptain instead of his own. Please note that both the statements are 100% TRUE.
The problem can be explained this way: the first statement has a portion of true information omitted in the second one, and the second statement has the portion of true information not incorporated into the first one.
Here you are some clarifications before start delving into the matter:
Painting of ship’s side with cargo operations in progress or if cargo is stowed on the peer is treated as a major failure to comply with NYK Line instructions. Latter can lead to a warning and lowering the rating of the ship’s Management Company, sacking C/O or even Master, and banning the ship from serving a particular Major at all.
On the other side, poorly painted ship’s side is always a concern by NYK Line auditors, as it does not give impression of a rust-free and clean car carrier. And it should be rust-free and clean! Same time, it is a concern for ship’s Superintendent answering for the ship’s condition in front of the Owners and Charterers. Thus, no doubt, fresh looking ship’s side is a concern for the ship’s Master and his C/O.
Previous practice implied obtaining Agent's and a Portcaptain's permissions to paint on the ship’s side while alongside. Normally, if no special local regulations applicable, if care is taken for pollution prevention, if area to be painted is not close to the cargo, and if no such factors as wind blowing in an undesirable direction are present – a verbal permission was normally granted. Then work was going on with nerves and tensions all the time because if anything goes wrong – ship lands in a major problem.
There are two different types of Portcaptains in NYK Line. Local Portcaptains – responsible for coordination of the operations in the particular area, and the Japanese Portcaptains. The later are the trusted watch called to survey cargo operations go NYK Line style, and they do not often have concern with the rest of practical world of shipping. Some of Japanese Portcaptains are very practical people and try to find ways to improve quality of cargo handling with methods suitable in a particular situation. But some of them happen to be hard-headed samurais having lost all rapport with the Stevedores or with the local NYK Line staff and thus switching over to the only soft target – the ship’s staff.
Due to its position of a very powerful customer, NYK always exercises huge influence on the ship’s Management Company. Nothing similar is possible in relations with the Stevedores or local NYK staff, who stay protected by thick fences of national or union regulations. Financial relations between the Carrier and Consignee also allow the shore-based personnel for another degree of freedom from NYK.
The Statements of Facts emerged as a result of personal clash between C/O and that time Japanese Portcaptain. The clash started actually from much more mundane matters, not at all related to the case described.
So...
What happened
C/O alerted me of the Portcaptain’s making a statement of facts related to our ship’s side painting.
Then it took almost one hour to bring down the raging storm purely by courtesy and by showing the knowledge of NYK procedures.
Finally the Japanese Portcaptain accepted my version of statement instead of his and promised not to raise this matter in NYK on condition that ship inform Managers of the accident and carry out additional training on NYK procedure for the involved in painting ship’s staff.
Therefore after signing by the both parties I sent a copy of the final Statement to my Fleet Manager, parently talked to C/O, obliged him to discus the matter with the deck crew, and had that matter closed.
Conclusion
Truth has many facets. One asserts his side of the truth, despite one often sees the matter in full 3D.
The problem can be explained this way: the first statement has a portion of true information omitted in the second one, and the second statement has the portion of true information not incorporated into the first one.
Here you are some clarifications before start delving into the matter:
Painting of ship’s side with cargo operations in progress or if cargo is stowed on the peer is treated as a major failure to comply with NYK Line instructions. Latter can lead to a warning and lowering the rating of the ship’s Management Company, sacking C/O or even Master, and banning the ship from serving a particular Major at all.
On the other side, poorly painted ship’s side is always a concern by NYK Line auditors, as it does not give impression of a rust-free and clean car carrier. And it should be rust-free and clean! Same time, it is a concern for ship’s Superintendent answering for the ship’s condition in front of the Owners and Charterers. Thus, no doubt, fresh looking ship’s side is a concern for the ship’s Master and his C/O.
Previous practice implied obtaining Agent's and a Portcaptain's permissions to paint on the ship’s side while alongside. Normally, if no special local regulations applicable, if care is taken for pollution prevention, if area to be painted is not close to the cargo, and if no such factors as wind blowing in an undesirable direction are present – a verbal permission was normally granted. Then work was going on with nerves and tensions all the time because if anything goes wrong – ship lands in a major problem.
There are two different types of Portcaptains in NYK Line. Local Portcaptains – responsible for coordination of the operations in the particular area, and the Japanese Portcaptains. The later are the trusted watch called to survey cargo operations go NYK Line style, and they do not often have concern with the rest of practical world of shipping. Some of Japanese Portcaptains are very practical people and try to find ways to improve quality of cargo handling with methods suitable in a particular situation. But some of them happen to be hard-headed samurais having lost all rapport with the Stevedores or with the local NYK Line staff and thus switching over to the only soft target – the ship’s staff.
Due to its position of a very powerful customer, NYK always exercises huge influence on the ship’s Management Company. Nothing similar is possible in relations with the Stevedores or local NYK staff, who stay protected by thick fences of national or union regulations. Financial relations between the Carrier and Consignee also allow the shore-based personnel for another degree of freedom from NYK.
The Statements of Facts emerged as a result of personal clash between C/O and that time Japanese Portcaptain. The clash started actually from much more mundane matters, not at all related to the case described.
So...
Original statement prepared by the Portcaptain |
Final statement in my interpretation |
What happened
C/O alerted me of the Portcaptain’s making a statement of facts related to our ship’s side painting.
Then it took almost one hour to bring down the raging storm purely by courtesy and by showing the knowledge of NYK procedures.
Finally the Japanese Portcaptain accepted my version of statement instead of his and promised not to raise this matter in NYK on condition that ship inform Managers of the accident and carry out additional training on NYK procedure for the involved in painting ship’s staff.
Therefore after signing by the both parties I sent a copy of the final Statement to my Fleet Manager, parently talked to C/O, obliged him to discus the matter with the deck crew, and had that matter closed.
Conclusion
Truth has many facets. One asserts his side of the truth, despite one often sees the matter in full 3D.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Blog's Most Popular Posts last week
-
Fresh Water Allowance (FWA) is the amount by which a ship's mean draft changes when she moves from the sea standard salt water (SW @...
-
Потребление бункера зависит от размера судна и его скорости. Для контейнеровозов в диапазоне от минимальных скоростей до 14 узлов эта завис...
-
Pipe description ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Pipes are described by nominal size (e.g. 125A), which refers to and approximately matches ...
-
Neither of the ISO 9001, 17001, 19011 standards define the validity period of the certificates for internal auditors. There is an opinion th...
-
I have received the following msg from a ship: Good afternoon , the ship drifting in the South China Sea, the crew is divided opinio...
-
Несмотря на свою важность и частоту упоминания в многочисленных источниках, морской протест остается одним из наиболее загадочных документо...
-
At the foundation of effective management for any organization is the fundamental truth that all organizations, like all living organisms, h...
-
T ahara, Toyohashi, prefecture of Aichi, Japan - this is the address of Lexus or Toyota may be coming from. Thousands of Toyotas and Lexus...
-
ColRegs, Rule 3 paragraph (f): The term “vessel not under command” means a vessel which through some exceptional circumstance is unable to ...
-
The company I sailed for - Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (NYK) - implements some theoretical background in its safety programmes. Looking fo...